Greenhouse alternative
Structured hiring needs structural signal.
Greenhouse brought structure to interviews. Chiron brings trustworthy evidence to technical hiring — an AI-native ATS whose screen measures real engineering work, not rehearsed answers.
Beyond structure
What structure can't fix on its own.
Structure isn't signal
Scorecards and structured loops standardize opinions. In the AI era the artifacts behind them — résumés, take-homes — are what broke.
Evidence at the core
Chiron's screen produces artifacts worth structuring: real code, checkpointed reasoning, and how the candidate directed the AI.
One system, not a stack
Skip the ATS + assessment-vendor + scheduler stack for technical roles: one pipeline where the assessment is native.
An honest comparison
Different jobs to be done.
Choose Greenhouse if
You want an enterprise-proven horizontal ATS for the whole company and already trust your technical screen.
Choose Chiron if
You're hiring engineers and want the screen and the pipeline to be one defensible system built for the AI era.