Ashby alternative
Great pipelines deserve trustworthy signal.
Ashby is a strong workflow ATS. Chiron is an AI-native alternative for technical teams — the pipeline plus an assessment core that makes the signal moving through it worth trusting.
The difference in one idea
Workflow moves candidates. Signal decides them.
Workflow ATSes
Ashby, Greenhouse, and Lever excel at moving candidates through stages. But they inherit their inputs: AI-written résumés and AI-completed take-homes flow through on trust.
Assessment vendors
Point tools bolt a test onto your ATS and defend pre-AI formats with proctoring. The signal lives outside the pipeline where decisions happen.
Chiron
One platform where the assessment is native: real work with an AI pair, scored on code, reasoning, and AI-direction — and every pipeline decision can cite it.
An honest comparison
Different jobs to be done.
Choose Ashby if
You need a mature horizontal ATS across every department today, with deep integrations and analytics — and your technical signal comes from elsewhere.
Choose Chiron if
Technical hiring is the job to be done: you want the pipeline and a defensible technical screen in one system, built for candidates who code with AI.